![]() Compounding its glitches that would munch away at a golden performance, its attempt to bridge legacy and new functionality resulted in inane shortcuts a split-second slip of the finger would force me into hours of tinkering to recall a mis-toggled function or hidden window. Even as I moved on from AutoCAD, I stuck with Cakewalk through habit for many years, appreciating its incremental improvements, but realizing that its long-lived legacy was exactly its Achilles heel. Programs like AutoCAD and Cakewalk, with one foot shackled to the analog conceptual world, became bloated to accommodate new functions within old form. To take the analogy further, mid-2000s software during the dreaded Windows Vista era became the equivalent of ‘80s gas guzzlers. Both programs were game changers for obvious reasons, but as software development goes, new products like Studio One don’t just move the game forward in a linear way, they leapfrog several steps ahead. Where the latter made digital drafting available to the masses, the former allowed me to move from tape to digital within the ubiquitous Windows OS. Cakewalk was my musician’s version of AutoCAD. ![]() For this reason, I can’t help making parallel comparisons between the two. JH: I started using recording software, namely Cakewalk, in 1992 – roughly the same year I started using AutoCAD for architecture. We invited both writers to tell us about their experiences with Studio One 4.5 Professional. Meanwhile, John Hong recorded, mixed, and mastered on his Windows laptop using Cakewalk. Previously, Dana Gumbiner relied primarily on Pro Tools in the studio and at home, while he also served as our resident expert on Ableton Live (which he continues to use for electronic music production and stage performance). Two of our veteran contributing writers recently switched to Studio One for music recording and mixing. Over the years, the DAW’s feature set has grown significantly, and, impressively, it remains one of the most streamlined audio applications in terms of its user experience. Read More.It’s been nearly a decade since we published a review of the original version of Studio One. But even that's made up for in the community based around this DAW. ![]() The only complaint I have is the customer support. Seriously, I couldn't recommend this DAW enough. Overall: Overall, I've had little to no problems using Studio One in the 3 years I've used it. If you need help fast, though, Studio One still has a really large and growing community of amazing people who are always willing to help. Also, the first party customer support is really slow (I've waited upwards of 2 weeks for help before). I started out on it and it held me back a lot back in the day. It'll also go on sale for $13.99 quite often.Ĭons: There's not much to dislike about studio one, but it would be good if they added VST support to their lowest tier, Prime. It has an option to buy windy of the 3 tiers in full up front, OR you can get EVERYTHING PreSonus has to offer (software-wise) for just $15.99 a month. I also own Pro Tools, Ableton Live, and used to own FL Studio, but I actually prefer Studio One to all of these. Pros: I've been using studio one for 3 years now and it is the best, easiest to use DAW I've tried to this date.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |